City Comparison
Al Qurna Center vs Moscow
Cost of living, salaries, climate and quality of life compared side by side.
VS
Al Qurna Center scores higher overall
Performance
Score Breakdown
Al Qurna Center
Moscow
Livability
Affordability
Business
Growth
Expenses
Cost of Living
Al Qurna Center is the more affordable option overall — monthly living expenses run approximately
72% lower compared to Moscow.
Housing costs are a major driver: Al Qurna Center's average rent is
91% lower than Moscow's.
| Metric | Al Qurna Center | Moscow | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Rent | $124 | $1,338 | -91% |
| Groceries | $136 | $0 | 0% |
| Utilities | $30 | $0 | 0% |
| Transport | $50 | $0 | 0% |
| Healthcare | $40 | $0 | 0% |
| Monthly Total | $380 | $1,338 | -72% |
| Cost Index | 25 | 111 | out of 100 |
Income
Salary & Income
Moscow offers 96% lower average salaries.
However, when adjusted for local cost of living, Moscow delivers stronger purchasing power —
meaning your dollar stretches further day-to-day.
The minimum comfortable salary in Al Qurna Center is estimated at
$1,632 vs $84,360 in Moscow.
| Metric | Al Qurna Center | Moscow |
|---|---|---|
| Average Salary | $3,084 | $76,000 |
| Salary Needed | $1,632 | $84,360 |
| Purchasing Power | 12,336 idx | 68,468 idx |
Weather
Climate Comparison
Both cities share a similar average temperature, within 0°F of each other.
| Metric | Al Qurna Center | Moscow |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Temp | °F | °F |
| Summer High | °F | °F |
| Winter Low | °F | °F |
| Rainfall | in | in |
| Snowfall | in | in |
| Sunny Days | ||
| Humidity | 30.00% | % |
Mobility
Commute & Transport
Al Qurna Center has the shorter commute — saving residents roughly
7,000 minutes (117 hours) per year compared to Moscow.
Moscow scores higher for public transit, making it the better choice for car-free living.
For walkability, Al Qurna Center leads — a better score here means more amenities reachable on foot.
| Metric | Al Qurna Center | Moscow |
|---|---|---|
| Commute Time | min | 14 min |
| Transit Score | 30.0/10 | 45.0/10 |
| Walkability | 50.0/10 | 48.0/10 |
| Traffic Index | 40.00 | |
| Car Dependency | Medium | Medium |
Population
Economy & Demographics
Al Qurna Center is the larger city
— approximately 10.8x the population of Moscow.
From a growth perspective, Al Qurna Center is expanding faster, signaling stronger demand for housing, jobs, and services.
On the employment side, Moscow has a lower unemployment rate, reflecting a tighter and more competitive job market.
| Metric | Al Qurna Center | Moscow |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 284,952 | 26,286 |
| Pop. Growth | 1.82% | 0.80% |
| Median Age | 25.7 | |
| Unemployment | 5.80% | 3.00% |
| GDP | $0.0B | $0.0B |
At a Glance
Pros & Cons
Al Qurna Center
Advantages
Affordable cost of living, with a 1-bedroom apartment in the city center averaging $124 per month [34].
Rich historical and cultural heritage, with world-renowned archaeological sites like Karnak Temple and the Valley of the Kings nearby.
Growing healthcare sector with expanded access through the Universal Health Insurance System covering over 90% of the population [27, 29].
Abundant sunshine and a dry desert climate, offering pleasant weather for most of the year, especially during winter months [4, 6].
Tourism is a significant economic driver, creating opportunities in hospitality and related services.
Drawbacks
Extremely hot summers with average high temperatures exceeding 40°C (104°F) [4].
Limited public transportation options, with a low transit score of 3/10 [36].
Low average income levels, with the average monthly net salary in Luxor estimated at $68.1 [34].
Walkability is moderate (5/10) and car dependency is likely high for accessing many sites [36].
Limited availability of specific demographic and economic data for Al Qurna Center itself, often requiring reliance on broader Luxor or national statistics.
Moscow
Advantages
High walkability score of 48, making many errands accessible on foot.
Short average commute time of 14.3 minutes, significantly below the national average.
Strong presence of the University of Idaho contributes to a vibrant cultural scene and job market.
Crime rates have seen a significant decrease, with violent crime rates well below the national average.
Rental prices are relatively affordable compared to national averages, despite a higher cost of living than the Idaho average.
Drawbacks
Median household income ($57,022) is below the national average.
Cost of living is 11% higher than the national average.
Limited public transit options contribute to a medium car dependency.
Job growth rate of 0.167% is modest.
Median age of 25.7 is significantly younger than the national average, which may not appeal to all demographics.
Explore
Dive Deeper
Key figures side by side — see which city wins each category at a glance.
Al Qurna Center
#12Luxor, Egypt
72.0 / 100 overall
Avg Rent
$124
Avg Salary
$3,084
Cost Index
25
Commute
min
Transit Score
30.0/10
Walkability
50.0/10
Sunny Days
/yr
Avg Temp
°F
Pop. Growth
1.82%
Unemployment
5.80%
Livability
68
Business
55
Moscow
#72Idaho, USA
60.2 / 100 overall
Avg Rent
$1,338
Avg Salary
$76,000
Cost Index
111
Commute
14 min
Transit Score
45.0/10
Walkability
48.0/10
Sunny Days
/yr
Avg Temp
°F
Pop. Growth
0.80%
Unemployment
3.00%
Livability
87
Business
65
Calculate Your Cost Impact
Estimate the salary you'd need when moving between Al Qurna Center and Moscow.
Open Cost Calculator