City Comparison
Lundu vs Folsom
Cost of living, salaries, climate and quality of life compared side by side.
VS
California, USA
View Folsom profile
We're still gathering intelligence for Folsom. Refresh in a moment for full data.
Lundu scores higher overall
Performance
Score Breakdown
Lundu
Folsom
Livability
Affordability
Business
Growth
Expenses
Cost of Living
| Metric | Lundu | Folsom | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Rent | $320 | $0 | 0% |
| Groceries | $180 | $0 | 0% |
| Utilities | $60 | $0 | 0% |
| Transport | $75 | $0 | 0% |
| Healthcare | $50 | $0 | 0% |
| Monthly Total | $685 | $0 | 0% |
| Cost Index | 42 | out of 100 |
Income
Salary & Income
Lundu offers similar average salaries.
| Metric | Lundu | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| Average Salary | $8,500 | $0 |
| Salary Needed | $7,200 | $0 |
Weather
Climate Comparison
Lundu runs warmer on average — a 79.8°F difference year-round.
For sunshine, Lundu comes out ahead with 75 more sunny days per year,
which can meaningfully impact mood and outdoor lifestyle.
Winter severity differs too — Lundu sees 0 more inches of snowfall annually.
| Metric | Lundu | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Temp | 79.80°F | °F |
| Summer High | 89.00°F | °F |
| Winter Low | 72.90°F | °F |
| Rainfall | 147.10 in | in |
| Snowfall | 0.00 in | in |
| Sunny Days | 75 | |
| Humidity | 85.00% | % |
Mobility
Commute & Transport
Folsom has the shorter commute — saving residents roughly
11,000 minutes (183 hours) per year compared to Lundu.
Lundu scores higher for public transit, making it the better choice for car-free living.
For walkability, Lundu leads — a better score here means more amenities reachable on foot.
| Metric | Lundu | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| Commute Time | 22 min | min |
| Transit Score | 35.0/100 | — |
| Walkability | 58.0/100 | — |
| Traffic Index | 28.00 | |
| Car Dependency | High |
Population
Economy & Demographics
Lundu is the larger city
.
From a growth perspective, Lundu is expanding faster, signaling stronger demand for housing, jobs, and services.
On the employment side, Folsom has a lower unemployment rate, reflecting a tighter and more competitive job market.
| Metric | Lundu | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 36,500 | 0 |
| Pop. Growth | 1.10% | — |
| Median Age | 33.0 | |
| Unemployment | 3.80% | % |
| GDP | — | — |
At a Glance
Pros & Cons
Lundu
Advantages
Significantly lower cost of living compared to major urban centers in Malaysia backed by Department of Statistics data
Proximity to world-class natural attractions including Gunung Gading National Park and pristine beaches
Extremely low crime rate and secure community environment ideal for families and retirees
Rich multicultural heritage featuring diverse local cuisine and vibrant community festivals
High affordability for housing purchases and daily groceries relative to regional income levels
Drawbacks
Limited public transit infrastructure requiring heavy reliance on private vehicles
Scarcity of high-paying corporate jobs or advanced career sectors locally
Need to travel to Kuching for specialized medical care or higher education services
Prone to heavy seasonal monsoon rainfall impacting outdoor activities and localized transport
Limited modern entertainment and nightlife options compared to larger cities
Folsom
Explore
Dive Deeper
Key figures side by side — see which city wins each category at a glance.
Lundu
#14Sarawak, Malaysia
81.4 / 100 overall
Avg Rent
$320
Avg Salary
$8,500
Cost Index
42
Commute
22 min
Transit Score
35.0/100
Walkability
58.0/100
Sunny Days
75/yr
Avg Temp
79.80°F
Pop. Growth
1.10%
Unemployment
3.80%
Livability
75
Business
58
Folsom
California, USA
0.0 / 100 overall
Avg Rent
$0
Avg Salary
$0
Cost Index
Commute
min
Transit Score
—
Walkability
—
Sunny Days
/yr
Avg Temp
°F
Pop. Growth
%
Unemployment
%
Livability
0
Business
0
Calculate Your Cost Impact
Estimate the salary you'd need when moving between Lundu and Folsom.
Open Cost Calculator